<head><META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="mof.css" xmlns:lxslt="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"> <title>DMTF Schema Documentation Schema Documentation</title> </head><html> <body bgcolor="White"> <hr> </hr> <a name="CIM_SubUoWDef"></a> <H1>Class CIM_SubUoWDef<BR>extends <a href="CIM_Dependency.html">CIM_Dependency</a> </H1>This association defines the sub-UnitsOfWork (the sub- transactions) for a particular UnitOfWorkDefinition. For example, an 'AddOrder' UnitOfWork could have sub-Units of 'ValidateCustomer', 'ValidatePartNumber', 'UpdateDatabase', etc. This is a Dependency relationship since the sub-UnitsOf Work are put in context relative to the parent Unit. It is not an aggregation relationship - since (using another example) a 'DatabaseWrite' transaction is likely to be dependent upon a 'DiskWrite', but the two transactions are separate concepts and one is not 'contained' by the other.<h3> Table of Contents<br> <a href="#c_hierarchy">Hierarchy</a> <br> <a href="#c_subclasses">Direct Known Subclasses</a> <br> <a href="#c_qualifiers">Class Qualifiers</a> <br> <a href="#c_properties">Class Properties</a> <br> <a href="#c_methods">Class Methods</a> <br> </h3> <hr> </hr> <H2> <a name="c_hierarchy">Class Hierarchy</a> </H2> <a href="CIM_Dependency.html">CIM_Dependency</a> <br data="@NAME"> |<br> +--<b>CIM_SubUoWDef</b> <br data="CIM_SubUoWDef -- CIM_Dependency"> <H2> <a name="c_subclasses">Direct Known Subclasses</a> </H2> <H2> <a name="c_qualifiers">Class Qualifiers</a> </H2> <TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="1" WIDTH="100%"> <TR> <TH>Name</TH><TH>Data Type</TH><TH>Value</TH> </TR> <TR> <TD VALIGN="TOP">Association</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP">boolean</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP">true</TD> </TR> <TR> <TD VALIGN="TOP">Description</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP">string</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP">This association defines the sub-UnitsOfWork (the sub- transactions) for a particular UnitOfWorkDefinition. For example, an 'AddOrder' UnitOfWork could have sub-Units of 'ValidateCustomer', 'ValidatePartNumber', 'UpdateDatabase', etc. This is a Dependency relationship since the sub-UnitsOf Work are put in context relative to the parent Unit. It is not an aggregation relationship - since (using another example) a 'DatabaseWrite' transaction is likely to be dependent upon a 'DiskWrite', but the two transactions are separate concepts and one is not 'contained' by the other.</TD> </TR> <TR> <TD VALIGN="TOP">UMLPackagePath</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP">string</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP">CIM::Metrics::UnitOfWork</TD> </TR> <TR> <TD VALIGN="TOP">Version</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP">string</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP">2.6.0</TD> </TR> </TABLE> <H2> <a name="c_properties">Class Properties</a> </H2> <H3>Association References</H3> <TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="1" WIDTH="60%"> <TR> <TH>Name</TH><TH>Class Origin</TH><TH>Reference Class</TH> </TR> <TR> <TH VALIGN="TOP">Antecedent</TH><TD VALIGN="TOP">CIM_SubUoWDef</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP"><a href="CIM_UnitOfWorkDefinition.html">CIM_UnitOfWorkDefinition</a></TD> </TR> <TR> <TH VALIGN="TOP">Dependent</TH><TD VALIGN="TOP">CIM_SubUoWDef</TD><TD VALIGN="TOP"><a href="CIM_UnitOfWorkDefinition.html">CIM_UnitOfWorkDefinition</a></TD> </TR> </TABLE> <h2> <a name="c_methods">Class Methods</a> </h2> </body> </html>