From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:38:35 -0500 Subject: [cifs] fix broken mounts when a SSH tunnel is used Message-id: <1258641517-20756-9-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Patchwork-id: 21434 O-Subject: [RHEL5.5 PATCH 08/10] BZ#500838: cifs: fix broken mounts when a SSH tunnel is used (try #4) Bugzilla: 500838 RH-Acked-by: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com> From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> (Upstream commit bdb97adcdf0993adbd2eef44b4533620d43792de) One more try.. It seems there is a regression that got introduced while Jeff fixed all the mount/umount races. While attempting to find whether a tcp session is already existing, we were not checking whether the "port" used are the same. When a second mount is attempted with a different "port=" option, it is being ignored. Because of this the cifs mounts that uses a SSH tunnel appears to be broken. Steps to reproduce: 1. create 2 shares # SSH Tunnel a SMB session 2. ssh -f -L 6111:127.0.0.1:445 root@localhost "sleep 86400" 3. ssh -f -L 6222:127.0.0.1:445 root@localhost "sleep 86400" 4. tcpdump -i lo 6111 & 5. mkdir -p /mnt/mnt1 6. mkdir -p /mnt/mnt2 7. mount.cifs //localhost/a /mnt/mnt1 -o username=guest,ip=127.0.0.1,port=6111 #(shows tcpdump activity on port 6111) 8. mount.cifs //localhost/b /mnt/mnt2 -o username=guest,ip=127.0.0.1,port=6222 #(shows tcpdump activity only on port 6111 and not on 6222 Fix by adding a check to compare the port _only_ if the user tries to override the tcp port with "port=" option, before deciding that an existing tcp session is found. Also, clean up a bit by replacing if-else if by a switch statment while at it as suggested by Jeff. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishp@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c index e949b4e..e80f2e4 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c @@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ cifs_parse_mount_options(char *options, const char *devname, } static struct TCP_Server_Info * -cifs_find_tcp_session(struct sockaddr_storage *addr) +cifs_find_tcp_session(struct sockaddr_storage *addr, unsigned short int port) { struct list_head *tmp; struct TCP_Server_Info *server; @@ -1448,14 +1448,35 @@ cifs_find_tcp_session(struct sockaddr_storage *addr) if (server->tcpStatus == CifsNew) continue; - if (addr->ss_family == AF_INET && - (addr4->sin_addr.s_addr != - server->addr.sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr)) - continue; - else if (addr->ss_family == AF_INET6 && - !ipv6_addr_equal(&server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_addr, - &addr6->sin6_addr)) - continue; + switch (addr->ss_family) { + case AF_INET: + if (addr4->sin_addr.s_addr == + server->addr.sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr) { + addr4->sin_port = htons(port); + /* user overrode default port? */ + if (addr4->sin_port) { + if (addr4->sin_port != + server->addr.sockAddr.sin_port) + continue; + } + break; + } else + continue; + + case AF_INET6: + if (ipv6_addr_equal(&addr6->sin6_addr, + &server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_addr)) { + addr6->sin6_port = htons(port); + /* user overrode default port? */ + if (addr6->sin6_port) { + if (addr6->sin6_port != + server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_port) + continue; + } + break; + } else + continue; + } ++server->srv_count; write_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock); @@ -1537,7 +1558,7 @@ cifs_get_tcp_session(struct smb_vol *volume_info) } /* see if we already have a matching tcp_ses */ - tcp_ses = cifs_find_tcp_session(&addr); + tcp_ses = cifs_find_tcp_session(&addr, volume_info->port); if (tcp_ses) return tcp_ses; @@ -2697,9 +2718,9 @@ CIFSTCon(unsigned int xid, struct cifsSesInfo *ses, return -EIO; smb_buffer = cifs_buf_get(); - if (smb_buffer == NULL) { + if (smb_buffer == NULL) return -ENOMEM; - } + smb_buffer_response = smb_buffer; header_assemble(smb_buffer, SMB_COM_TREE_CONNECT_ANDX,